
On September 2016, the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) challenged the OSHA interpretation letter in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The lawsuit alleged that OSHA interpretation letter was essentially a rule within the meaning of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) and should have been subject to standard notice and comment rules. The NFIB further argued that the OSHA interpretation letter violated the OSH Act by allowing non-employees to accompany a compliance officer during an inspection.
OSHA originally defended the lawsuit and unsuccessfully sought to dismiss the APA claim. However, on April 25, 2017 OSHA sent a management memorandum to all regional administrators notifying them that the February 21, 2013 interpretive letter was being withdrawn and guidance consistent with the letter would be removed from the OSHA field operations guide. On April 27, 2017, OSHA voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit.
What this means for employers
This is good news and a great reminder for employers to review the composition and activities of their health and safety committees. With this development, OSHA must justify the reasons for having non-employee participation in an OSHA inspection.
Don’t give them that justification by:
- Designating and training employee representatives participating in OSHA inspections.
- Conducting regular safety inspections and proactively ensuring that all OSHA standards are met.
- Following up immediately on employees’ safety concerns.
Content provided by ThinkHR Copyright 2017
ThinkHR is an Employee Benefits solution for RHSB clients providing advanced HR knowledge and training -Expert Advisors, Employee Training, Compliance Tools, Benefits Document Creator. Contact RHSB to talk with a Employee Benefits Professional 972-231-1300 or 817-332-1313